Will a macaque eat a grape sitting on a pile of poo? A study on germophobia
0 / 44
English
中文
One of the macaques at a Texas sanctuary, where researchers ran tests to see if the monkeys became germophobes after experiencing a viral outbreak. Stephan Kaufhold hide caption In the very early days of COVID-19, millions who'd rarely thought twice about germ avoidance became germophobes.
（暂无翻译） （暂无翻译）
Some folks wiped down groceries before stuffing them into the refrigerator.
（暂无翻译）
Others let mail quarantine outside for days lest it harbor stray viruses. With the hindsight that SARS-CoV-2 spread primarily through the air, these sorts of precautions seem extreme. But in the moment, they were perhaps reasonable ways of avoiding an unknown pathogen. Around this same time, a different virus hit a macaque sanctuary in Texas.
（暂无翻译） （暂无翻译） （暂无翻译） （暂无翻译）
New research suggests the monkeys responded in similar ways as humans did to COVID-19 — by being extra germophobic. Humans are far from the only animals to avoid possible sources of disease.
（暂无翻译） （暂无翻译）
Scientists have found that critters as diverse as monkeys and nematodes (aka roundworms) can sense and steer clear of feces, for instance, which can harbor harmful bacteria. "Something that has been less studied is the question of how flexible this avoidance is," says Stephan Kaufhold, a cognitive scientist at UC San Diego.
（暂无翻译） （暂无翻译）
He wanted to see if experiencing an outbreak could make individual monkeys even more wary of picking up pathogens. The outbreak in the Texas sanctuary, home to over 100 macaques, offered Kaufhold and his colleagues an opportunity to put that question to the test.
（暂无翻译） （暂无翻译）
In 2020, macaques in an enclosure at the sanctuary started getting sick with an HIV-like virus called SRV.
（暂无翻译）
Once a monkey gets infected through bodily fluids, the disease "can take a rapid progression, where about three to four weeks after you initially get infected, you might die," says Kaufhold.
（暂无翻译）
Many monkeys died, while others developed chronic immunodeficiency. Sanctuary staff quickly started separating monkeys quickly, ultimately creating two groups — those who'd experienced the virus, either by getting sick themselves or witnessing others get sick, and those who hadn't experienced the outbreak.
（暂无翻译） （暂无翻译）
To see if those different histories made the monkeys more germophobic, the researchers presented individuals with two tasty treats — grapes.
（暂无翻译）
"They get a fantastic diet at the sanctuary, but not grapes every day, so grapes were definitely a treat," says Kaufhold.
（暂无翻译）
One red grape was presented on a non-descript, clean-looking piece of wood.
（暂无翻译）
The other was on top of macaque poop, encased in epoxy. "Basically not to make the animals eat off actual feces," says Kaufhold. "It did look quite gross, feces with a glossy wet look. Definitely worked also in triggering disgust in humans." From 2022 to 2024, the researchers presented monkeys with this choice in nearly 200 trials.
（暂无翻译） （暂无翻译） （暂无翻译） （暂无翻译） （暂无翻译）
Among monkeys who didn't experience the outbreak, 79% ate the poop-plated grape. But only 47% of the outbreak veterans ate it, researchers report in the journal Royal Society Open Science. Essentially, those who'd been oblivious to the outbreak were more likely to throw caution to the wind and eat the poop-plated grape than those who'd lived through it.
（暂无翻译） （暂无翻译） （暂无翻译）
"I was surprised," says Kaufhold.
（暂无翻译）
"I think it's pretty clear evidence that something is going on." Kaufhold thinks that something might be a heightened sensitivity to disgust. "If you think about disgust, the evolutionary origins most likely are to try to protect the body from contamination because there are pathogens and parasites that we ideally would want to avoid," he says.
（暂无翻译） （暂无翻译） （暂无翻译）
Becoming more easily disgusted after a devastating outbreak could pay off if it means avoiding infection, of whatever cause. Of course, scientists can't know whether macaques are actually experiencing disgust.
（暂无翻译） （暂无翻译）
"But the possibility that things like disgust are influencing the behavior of other species, and especially species like primates, it's definitely a possibility worth considering," says Andrew MacIntosh, a biologist at the Wilder Institute who wasn't involved in the study but has done similar experiments with macaques. "It seems plausible that past exposure to outbreaks could make individuals more cautious or risk averse," he says, but he thinks more evidence is needed to show that.
（暂无翻译） （暂无翻译）
For example, the experiment was carried out several years after the outbreak, enough time for other factors to influence these behaviors, he says. MacIntosh also points out that the fecal avoidance experiment bears little connection to how the initial outbreak spread, through bodily fluids transmitted through scratches or bites.
（暂无翻译） （暂无翻译）
"The mode of transmission of that virus has really nothing to do with fecal contamination," he says. Kaufhold doesn't think that's a problem.
（暂无翻译） （暂无翻译）
"We're not claiming that macaques had any sort of understanding of the mechanism of viruses, it just seems to be an increased caution," he says.
（暂无翻译）
People didn't initially know how SARS-CoV-2 spread either, he says, but many went to great lengths to avoid infection. Those impulses may have been shaped not by paranoia, but by evolution, as a way of staving off sickness in an uncertain world. For stories about life in our changing world, subscribe to NPR's Global Health newsletter.
（暂无翻译） （暂无翻译） （暂无翻译）
仅供学习使用，如有侵权请联系删除 · 查看原文