Tracking the money: The biggest donors in the 2026 US midterm elections
0 / 34
English
中文
The 2026 US midterms are on track to be the most expensive in the country’s history. Spending on political advertising alone is projected to reach $11.6bn, more than in any previous election cycle, including the 2024 presidential race, according to the ad-tracking firm AdImpact.
（暂无翻译） （暂无翻译）
Much of that money comes from wealthy donors, political nonprofits and businesses seeking to shape Washington’s priorities, and some of it passes through networks of organisations before it is spent.
（暂无翻译）
In this visual explainer, Al Jazeera uses Federal Election Commission data to trace the billionaires, financiers and companies behind the largest contributions ahead of the November 3 vote.
（暂无翻译）
The 50 largest donors and organisations have so far contributed a combined $2.77bn during the 2026 midterm election cycle.
（暂无翻译）
Republican-aligned contributors accounted for $1.67bn, or about 60 percent of donations, double the $832m (30 percent) from Democratic-aligned contributors.
（暂无翻译）
The remaining $264m, about 10 percent, came from contributors classified as bipartisan or special interest, including groups backing sports betting and cryptocurrency.
（暂无翻译）
Individuals can donate up to $3,500 per election to a US federal candidate’s campaign in the 2025–26 election cycle. Yet some of the people on this list have given hundreds of millions of dollars.
（暂无翻译） （暂无翻译）
That is legal because most of the money went not to candidates but to super political action committees, or super PACs, which can accept donations of any size.
（暂无翻译）
A super PAC is a group that can raise and spend unlimited sums to support or oppose candidates, mainly through advertising. The main condition is that it must not coordinate its spending with candidates or their campaigns.
（暂无翻译） （暂无翻译）
They emerged in 2010 after two court rulings paved the way for unlimited spending on elections by groups independent of candidates.
（暂无翻译）
Super PACs must report their donors to the Federal Election Commission (FEC), the US agency that oversees federal elections. But some major contributors, including One Nation and Majority Forward, are nonprofit groups that do not have to disclose their own donors.
（暂无翻译） （暂无翻译）
This can hide where political money originally comes from, a practice known as “dark money”.
（暂无翻译）
But Lawrence Lessig, a professor of law and leadership at Harvard Law School and a campaign finance reform advocate, argues that the money is hidden only from voters.
（暂无翻译）
“It’s not dark to the politicians. It’s dark to us,” he told Josh Rushing on Al Jazeera’s Let’s Focus, in a debate on money in US elections with Bradley Smith, a former chairman of the Federal Election Commission. “Nobody’s confused from the politician’s side about where this money is coming from, and they know what they need to do.” Elon Musk, the world’s richest man and head of Tesla and SpaceX, is the largest individual contributor of the cycle, with $446m, according to Federal Election Commission data.
（暂无翻译） （暂无翻译） （暂无翻译）
He is followed by Elizabeth and Richard Uihlein, founders of the shipping supplies company Uline, and Jeff and Janine Yass.
（暂无翻译）
Jeff Yass cofounded the trading firm Susquehanna International Group. All three have given to Republican-aligned groups.
（暂无翻译） （暂无翻译）
The largest Democratic-aligned donors are George Soros, the billionaire investor and founder of the Open Society Foundations; Mike Bloomberg, the former New York City mayor and founder of the financial data company Bloomberg; and LinkedIn cofounder Reid Hoffman and his wife, Michelle Yee.
（暂无翻译）
Four individual donors have each given more than $100m.
（暂无翻译）
For Lessig, that concentration, not the overall cost of elections, is the real concern. “The problem isn’t the spending.
（暂无翻译） （暂无翻译）
The problem is the concentration of donors,” he said. “If you don’t have $100 million to put on the table, you’re not going to matter in the way that we think that people ought to matter in a democracy.” Political nonprofits led the organisational rankings, alongside cryptocurrency firms and an industrial conglomerate. On the Republican side, the largest was One Nation, a nonprofit aligned with Senate Republican leadership, followed by American Action Network, which is linked to House Republican leadership.
（暂无翻译） （暂无翻译） （暂无翻译）
On the Democratic side, Majority Forward and House Majority Forward, nonprofits allied with the party’s Senate and House leadership, led the way.
（暂无翻译）
Cryptocurrency companies also featured prominently. Coinbase, the largest US crypto exchange, gave $57.8m, followed by Ripple, the blockchain payments company, with $49.6m, and Foris DAX, the company behind Crypto.com, with $39m.
（暂无翻译） （暂无翻译）
The industrial conglomerate Koch gave $46.8m, while the sports betting company DraftKings contributed $40.4m.
（暂无翻译）
仅供学习使用，如有侵权请联系删除 · 查看原文