Nandy 'minded to intervene' in Sky's £1.6bn takeover of ITV entertainment arm
0 / 22
English
中文
Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy has said she is "minded to intervene" in the proposed £1.6bn deal for Sky to buy ITV's media and entertainment division.
（暂无翻译）
Nandy said there were reasonable grounds to believe the deal could affect free expression in the media and the variety of Britain's news landscape.
（暂无翻译）
Sky said it would "carefully consider" a letter from the culture secretary and "engage constructively" with the review into the deal.
（暂无翻译）
"We remain confident that bringing Sky and ITV's media and entertainment business together will create a stronger British media," it said.
（暂无翻译）
ITV welcomed the letter and said the deal would help it "compete with global streaming platforms, benefiting viewers, advertisers and the UK creative industries".
（暂无翻译）
The two companies announced in July that Sky had agreed to buy ITV's broadcasting business, including its free-to-air TV channels and the ITV X streaming service.
（暂无翻译）
The deal does not include ITV's production arm, ITV Studios, which makes popular programmes such as Love Island and I'm a Celebrity... Get Me Out of Here.
（暂无翻译） （暂无翻译）
It would give Sky access to millions more viewers, while bosses hope it would help both compete with streaming giants such as Netflix.
（暂无翻译）
What Sky buying ITV could mean for your favourite shows But Nandy has told Sky and ITV that she is considering issuing a public interest intervention notice (PIIN) to the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) and regulator Ofcom, forcing an investigation into the tie-up.
（暂无翻译）
In a letter to both companies, she said she was minded to order the probe to address public interest considerations including: The need for free expression of opinion in news media The need for a range of views in news media across the UK The need for a range of people controlling the media across the UK The need for a wide range of programmes to be offered across the UK The letter said Nandy recognised Sky News and ITV News were two of the most prominent sources of television news in the UK, with a joint 26% share of those viewing news on linear TV.
（暂无翻译）
Consumers would still have access to other sources of news such as the BBC and Channel 4, it added.
（暂无翻译）
But Nandy believes that, over time, the tie-up could undermine the range of views available to viewers, with 86% of the linear TV news market controlled by the BBC and Sky/ITV.
（暂无翻译）
The North of England could be particularly hard hit as well as nations of the UK other than England and those from lower socio-economic backgrounds, the letter argued.
（暂无翻译）
This is because their main source of news is broadcast news, it added.
（暂无翻译）
Sky and ITV have been given until 20 October to respond to the culture secretary's concerns.
（暂无翻译）
A Sky spokesperson said: "We have already made clear commitments to protect ITV's identity, its free-to-air services and public service broadcasting obligations, and to ensure ITV News and Sky News remain distinct editorial voices."
（暂无翻译）
An ITV spokesperson said: "We welcome the publication of the secretary of state's 'minded to' issue a public interest intervention notice letter as was expected and look forward to fully co-operating in the process.
（暂无翻译）
"This is another important milestone in the regulatory review process towards creating a UK player with the scale and resources to better compete with global streaming platforms, benefiting viewers, advertisers and the UK creative industries."
（暂无翻译）
Nandy's intervention would be made under a new public interest consideration.
（暂无翻译）
This would need legislation to be brought forward, given that current laws do not cover the effect of a merger on streaming or on-demand programmes.
（暂无翻译）
She said: "If I decide to intervene on the basis of this new public interest consideration, I will bring forward legislation... to extend the application of the public interest consideration relating to the availability of a wide range of broadcasting to on-demand programmes."
（暂无翻译）
仅供学习使用，如有侵权请联系删除 · 查看原文