How virtual safety car cost Norris win - and should F1 change rules?
0 / 75
English
中文
Lando Norris is now five points third-placed Lewis Hamilton in the drivers' championship Lando Norris says he was "insanely unlucky" to lose what seemed like a certain win in the Spanish Grand Prix because of the timing of a virtual safety car.
兰多*诺里斯现在在车手锦标赛中获得5分第三名刘易斯*汉密尔顿 兰多*诺里斯说，由于虚拟安全车的时机，他在西班牙大奖赛中失去了似乎是一场胜利的胜利，这是"疯狂的不幸"。
McLaren's Norris was leading comfortably when the VSC was called, seconds after he had passed the pit lane entry.
迈凯轮的诺里斯在VSC被召唤时舒适地领先，几秒钟后，他已经通过了坑道入口。
That allowed Mercedes' Kimi Antonelli and Red Bull's Max Verstappen to pit under the VSC, saving time, while the caution period ended before Norris could make it around to the pits again.
这使得梅赛德斯的Kimi Antonelli和红牛的Max Verstappen在VSC下进站，节省了时间，而谨慎期在诺里斯可以再次进入坑前结束。
Of the VSC, Norris said: "It is a rule that should not define a whole race."
对于VSC，诺里斯说："这是一个不应该定义整个种族的规则。"
"I was the only one on the whole grid that didn't get the chance to do the pit stop," he said.
"我是整个网格中唯一一个没有机会进行进站的人，"他说。
"That's just unfortunate. "There's been plenty of times where I've gained from it in the past and times where I've lost from it, and it's racing, but never when fighting for a win.
"那只是不幸。 "过去有很多次我从中获益，也有很多次我从中失败，这是赛车，但从来没有为胜利而战。
"So, it's probably one of the first times a win has been lost simply because of it."
"所以，这可能是第一次仅仅因为胜利而输掉胜利。"
After taking pole position with a lap his team principal Andrea Stella described as "a masterpiece", Norris was leading Antonelli by more than six seconds after 13 laps in Madrid.
在他的团队负责人安德烈*斯特拉（Andrea Stella）以一圈的成绩获得杆位后，诺里斯在马德里的13圈之后领先安东内利超过6秒。
He had just passed the pit entry at the end of lap 14 when a VSC was called because Lance Stroll's Aston Martin had stopped in the run-off area at Turn 20, while Antonelli and Verstappen were far enough behind to pit.
他刚刚在第14圈结束时通过了一个vsc，因为Lance Stroll的阿斯顿马丁在20号转弯时停在了跑区，而Antonelli和Verstappen远远落后于进站。
The VSC, which controls all cars to a specified maximum speed, then ended shortly before Norris completed the next lap, at the end of which he pitted.
VSC将所有汽车控制在指定的最大速度，然后在诺里斯完成下一圈之前不久结束，在结束时他进站。
Because a stop under the VSC costs 11 seconds less race time than one under green-flag conditions, Norris lost sufficient time that Antonelli and Verstappen were able to pass him.
由于在VSC下停留的时间比在绿旗条件下的比赛时间少11秒，诺里斯失去了足够的时间让安东内利和维斯塔彭能够超过他。
Norris lost a further five seconds because of problems with his two right-hand side tyres at the stop and emerged from the pits more than 15 seconds behind Antonelli and more than nine adrift of Verstappen.
诺里斯因为他的两个右手边轮胎在停车处出现问题而失去了另外五秒，并且在安东内利后面超过15秒，在Verstappen的9次以上漂泊中从坑中出来。
He caught the Red Bull before the end of the race but as overtaking was virtually impossible on the new Madring street circuit, he was stuck in third place.
他在比赛结束前抓住了红牛，但由于在新的马德林街赛道上几乎不可能超车，他被困在第三位。
Race-winner Antonelli, who extended his championship lead to 81 points, acknowledged Norris' bad fortune.
比赛冠军安东内利将他的冠军领先优势扩大到81分，承认诺里斯的坏运气。
"If I have to be realistic and honest, today we didn't deserve to win," he said. "Lando deserved to win, and so I think our result was probably P2 or even P3." Antonelli wins as Norris loses out under virtual safety car Antonelli impressive and one of Colapinto's best weekends - driver ratings The VSC is a system by which the cars are forced to drive to a specified lap-time delta while a hazard on track is cleared.
"如果我必须现实和诚实，今天我们不配赢，"他说。 "兰多理应获胜，所以我认为我们的结果可能是P2甚至P3。" 安托内利赢了，诺里斯在虚拟安全车下输了 Antonelli令人印象深刻，也是Colapinto最好的周末之一-车手评级 VSC是一个系统，通过该系统，汽车被迫驾驶到指定的单圈时间三角洲，而轨道上的危险被清除。
It is used in certain circumstances in favour of deploying the actual safety car, usually when the hazard can be cleared relatively quickly, because it interferes less with the race and minimises the time lost under caution.
它用于某些情况下，有利于部署实际的安全车，通常是在危险可以相对快速清除的情况下，因为它对比赛的干扰较小，并且在谨慎的情况下最大限度地减
A physical safety car involves a modified high-performance road car entering the track and having the field line up behind it.
物理安全车涉及经过改装的高性能公路车进入赛道并在其后面排队。
The various protocols around its operation mean a safety-car period usually goes on for several laps, while in this case the VSC was in operation for less than a single lap.
围绕其运行的各种协议意味着安全车周期通常持续几圈，而在这种情况下，VSC的运行时间不到一圈。
The short duration of the VSC in this case was exactly why Norris was railing against the situation.
在这种情况下，VSC的持续时间很短，这正是诺里斯反对这种情况的原因。
Every other driver in the field had the opportunity to decide whether to pit or not - the only driver not given that option was Norris.
该领域的所有其他车手都有机会决定是否进站-唯一没有给出这种选择的车手是诺里斯。
The pit lane entry is before the final corner at the Madring, and Norris was in the last corner when it was called.
坑道入口在马德林的最后一个角落之前，诺里斯在最后一个角落，当它被调用。
The VSC ended when Norris was in Turn 21, the corner before the pit entry, on lap 15.
VSC结束时，诺里斯在第21圈，在进坑前的角落，在第15圈。
Antonelli, having stopped, was behind him in Turn 19.
安托内利停了下来，在他身后转19。
On most circuits, Norris would have had a chance to pass Verstappen and perhaps even do the same to Antonelli before the end, given his pace advantage on the day, but as Antonelli put it: "In the race, you're just stuck behind."
在大多数赛道上，诺里斯本来有机会通过Verstappen，甚至可能在结束前对Antonelli做同样的事情，因为他当天的速度优势，但正如Antonelli所说："在比赛中，你只是落后了。"
Norris was withering in his criticism of the track layout, saying: "I don't know how someone looks at this design and goes, 'Mint.'" But he did say there was "a lot of opportunity" to improve it for next year. Lando Norris' pit stop came a lap too late for him and then hit problems as McLaren's mechanics had trouble with both the right-hand side wheels After the race, one question asked of McLaren was whether pitting on the following lap was the best idea, or should Norris have stayed out?
诺里斯在他对赛道布局的批评中萎靡不振，他说："不知道有人如何看待这个设计并去，'薄荷。"但他确实说，明年有"很多机会"改进它。 兰多*诺里斯（Lando Norris）的进站对他来说太晚了一圈，然后遇到了问题，因为迈凯轮的机械师在右手侧车轮上都遇到了麻烦 比赛结束后，迈凯轮提出的一个问题是在下一圈进行点蚀是最好的主意，还是诺里斯应该留在外面？
Norris said: "I had to come in at the end of the lap because it was the only chance.
诺里斯说："我不得不在圈末进来，因为这是唯一的机会。
"It was still effectively some pit loss, (but) the fact that everyone's kind of on colder tyres and you're still minimising the pit loss.
"这实际上仍然是一些坑损失，（但是）事实上，每个人都喜欢较冷的轮胎，你仍然在最大限度地减少坑损失。
"The medium tyre (on which Norris had started the race) was destroyed and the hard tyre (to which Antonelli and Verstappen switched) was amazing.
诺里斯开始比赛的中型轮胎被摧毁，而安东内利和维斯塔彭转向的硬胎则令人惊叹。
"But the pace was very, very strong and on the hard tyre...
"但是速度非常非常强劲，而且在坚硬的轮胎上。..
I know they were stuck (behind Ferrari's Charles Leclerc, who stayed out under the VSC), we caught up 13, 14 seconds or more, almost.
我知道他们被卡住了（在法拉利的查尔斯*勒克莱尔（Charles Leclerc）身后，他留在VSC下），我们几乎赶上了13，14秒或更长时间。
So, plenty of positives.
所以，有很多积极因素。
A day full of positives, just one thing let it all down."
充满积极的一天，只有一件事让这一切都失望了。"
McLaren team principal Andrea Stella said: "We considered staying out, but you have to accept the fact that now you are on relatively used medium tyres. And the people behind you will be on new hard. So you're never going to open a gap on people on new hard." The other question was whether McLaren would have been wise to anticipate that the race director would call the VSC and pit Norris before it was deployed.
迈凯轮车队负责人Andrea Stella说："我们考虑过留在外面，但你必须接受这样一个事实，即现在你使用的是相对使用的中型轮胎。 而你身后的人将在新的努力。 所以你永远不会在新的硬盘上打开一个空白。" 另一个问题是，迈凯轮是否会明智地预料到比赛总监会在部署之前打电话给VSC和pit Norris。
McLaren team principal Andrea Stella said: "In hindsight, that would have been a good idea." But he pointed out that, in the moment, it would have come with risks. The long pit lane at the Madring - the longest on the calendar - meant a pit stop cost a lot of time.
迈凯轮车队负责人安德烈斯特拉说："事后看来，这将是一个好主意。" 但他指出，在目前，它会带来风险。 Madring的长进站车道-日历上最长的-意味着进站需要花费大量时间。
Stella said: "I would have to review with my engineers, see whether it was kind of obvious that it would end up in a virtual safety car.
斯特拉说："我将不得不与我的工程师进行审查，看看它是否会在虚拟安全车中结束。
Therefore, you try to anticipate or not.
因此，你试图预测与否。
"Here, the problem is that you need to be extremely careful, because it's 27 seconds if you don't pit under a virtual safety car. "So if you get it wrong, it would be extremely penalising.
"在这里，问题是你需要非常小心，因为如果你没有在虚拟安全车下坑，那就是27秒。 "所以如果你弄错了，那将是非常惩罚的。
From the lead, you pit unnecessarily, and now you have lost the victory. "So a good rule is to respond to what is a fact, to what is the real condition of the circuit.
从领先，你不必要地坑，现在你已经失去了胜利。 "所以一个好的规则是回应什么是事实，什么是电路的真实状况。
"But we will definitely take a look as to whether in these conditions it was just simply, you know, obvious that he would end up in a virtual safety car.
"但我们肯定会看看在这种情况下，它是否只是简单的，你知道，很明显，他最终会在一个虚拟的安全车。
I cannot answer at the moment." VSCs and safety cars are commonplace in F1 and they always afford drivers and teams the chance to gain or lose depending on the decisions they make when they occur.
我现在不能回答。" VSCs和安全车在F1中很常见，它们总是为驾驶员和车队提供获得或失去的机会，具体取决于他们在发生时做出的决定。
Norris took his maiden victory in Miami in 2024 with the help of a safety car - he had delayed his stop and was able to make it under caution when race leader Verstappen had already stopped, and jumped into the lead.
诺里斯在一辆安全车的帮助下于2024年在迈阿密取得了他的处女胜利-他推迟了他的停车，并且能够在比赛领导者Verstappen已经停下来的情况下谨慎行事，并跃
And in Barcelona this year, Lewis Hamilton's maiden Ferrari victory was helped by a VSC that gave him a cheap pit stop on a different tyre strategy from rivals Mercedes. However, this is the only example many could remember of a race leader losing a race in this fashion by being the only driver not to be able to choose whether to pit under a VSC or safety car.
今年在巴塞罗那，刘易斯*汉密尔顿（Lewis Hamilton）的首次法拉利胜利得到了VSC的帮助，该VSC为他提供了一个与竞争对手梅赛德斯（Mercedes）不同的轮胎策略的廉价进站。 然而，这是许多人能够记住的唯一一个例子，比赛领导者以这种方式输掉了比赛，因为他是唯一一个无法选择是否在VSC或安全车下进站的车手。
After the race, Norris and Verstappen said this kind of scenario had been discussed by drivers many times with governing body the FIA.
比赛结束后，Norris和Verstappen表示，车手已经与国际汽联管理机构多次讨论过这种情况。
"I think there's always probably some cons to doing it, but it's tough," Norris said.
"我认为这样做总是可能有一些缺点，但这很艰难，"诺里斯说。
"I've won from it in the past, I've lost from it in the past.
"我过去赢过，过去输过。
Over the course of a season, it's hard to know if it's a good thing or a bad thing.
在一个赛季的过程中，很难知道这是好事还是坏事。
"It probably equals out over time.
"随着时间的推移，它可能会相等。
Of course, it just hurts more, the fact that I lose a win.
当然，它只是伤害更多，事实上，我失去了一场胜利。
You know, there's literally nothing I could do as a driver today to do a better job." Verstappen said: "We'll probably talk about it in the next briefing and see if there is anything that can be done."
你知道，今天作为一名司机，我已经无能为力了。" Verstappen说："我们可能会在下一次简报中谈论它，看看是否有任何可以做的事情。"
Stella added: "Perhaps there's a wider reflection that the Formula 1 community should apply as to whether you keep things like they are or you introduce ways of maintaining more fairness. "Offering the personal opinion. I'm puzzled myself as to what's right.
Stella补充说："也许有一个更广泛的反思，即Formula1社区应该适用于你是否保持原样，或者你引入了保持更多公平的方法。 "提供个人意见。 我对什么是对的感到困惑.
"Is it correct to give enough duration such that everyone will have been subject to the same track conditions?
"给出足够的持续时间，这样每个人都会受到相同的赛道条件，这是正确的吗？
So, for instance, the virtual safety car lasts at least one full lap?
因此，例如，虚拟安全车持续至少一个完整的圈？
Or you just keep it in the hands of the gods, and sometimes you are lucky, sometimes you are not. I'm not sure myself.
或者你只是把它放在众神的手中，有时你很幸运，有时你不是。 我自己也不确定。
"But in general, there's the right place to have this sort of conversation, which is the Strategy Advisory Committee (SAC). And this is a topic that may be added to the agenda and discussed over there. "But if there is to be a change, it will have to be a change that goes through the SAC, then the F1 Commission, and then we'll have to go at some stage to the sporting regulations. "But I would envisage that this is a relatively lengthy process, unless there's a big push from F1, from the institutions, FIA or F1, to say, like, 'we need to make this different'."
"但总的来说，有一个合适的地方进行这种对话，那就是战略咨询委员会（SAC）。 这是一个可能被添加到议程中并在那里讨论的主题。 "但如果要改变，就必须通过SAC，然后是F1委员会，然后我们必须在某个阶段进入体育法规。 "但我认为这是一个相对漫长的过程，除非F1，来自机构，国际汽联或F1的大力推动，比如说，'我们需要使这种不同'。"
McLaren talks, 'numb' cars and being 'captain of the ship' - Verstappen Q&A Andrew Benson Q&A: Send us your questions
迈凯轮谈话，"麻木"的汽车和成为"船长"-Verstappen Q&A 安德鲁*本森问答：把你的问题寄给我们
仅供学习使用，如有侵权请联系删除 · 查看原文